Home Our Insights Insights Practical Applications of Generative AI in Data Analysis: Navigating the Hype 

Practical Applications of Generative AI in Data Analysis: Navigating the Hype 

Łukasz Różycki Head of Enterprise Data & Analytics Solutions, Senior Director
9 min read
10.07.2024

Generative AI (GenAI) is revolutionizing data analysis, enabling businesses to harness advanced capabilities for better insights and decision-making. While the technology holds immense promise, it also comes with its share of challenges and hype. This article delves into the practical applications of GenAI, exploring both its benefits and the considerations needed for successful implementation. 

The State of Generative AI in Data Analysis 

Drawing upon E.M. Rogers’ model of innovation diffusion, GenAI is currently in the Trial stage within the enterprise data analysis sphere. Potential users are experimenting with its new applications typically on a limited scale to assess its value. It’s intriguing to be part of this process. However, it’s crucial to acknowledge that like any “revolutionary” technology, GenAI comes with its fair share of hype. It’s essential to remain mindful of this and recognize that GenAI also presents challenges. 

The AI industry is currently at a tipping point, demonstrated by Nvidia’s financial results. Their revenue more than tripled last year due to high demand for graphics chips in AI applications. Generative AI plays a significant role in this shift. Businesses are now actively testing and verifying where and how these applications can add value. 

The Impact of Generative AI 

Proven Benefits 

According to the Gartner Generative AI 2024 Planning survey of 822 business leaders, a significant number of executives currently implementing or planning to implement GenAI solutions have experienced notable benefits. On average, respondents have reported a 15.8% increase in revenue, 15.2% cost savings (including a 4.6% reduction in headcount), and a 22.6% improvement in productivity. 

The adoption of GenAI has proven to significantly boost worker productivity across different sectors. Studies reveal substantial improvements such as ChatGPT enhancing productivity by 37%, GenAI coding assistants yielding productivity gains ranging from 7% to 55%, and GenAI conversational assistants enhancing customer service and support agents’ productivity by 14% to 35%. 

So Hype? Even if it is, it’s becoming increasingly lucrative. 

Again according to Gartner, 55% of the 1419 organizations surveyed in September 2023 plan to increase their investment in AI. We just have to remember that as Gartner predicts, about 30% of generative AI projects will be abandoned after the POC stage due to poor data quality, no risk controls, rising costs, or unclear business value. 

New Dimension of Working with Data 

Data and analytics leaders tasked with evaluating and harnessing the potential of generative AI should consider that modern LLM models, while sometimes evoking a strong sense of being in the uncanny valley, require the establishment of robust foundations to ensure the quality of their performance and user experience. If we fail to provide these foundations, we’ll find ourselves in the valley of nonsense. 

GenAI has the potential to serve as a tool that enhances data accessibility by introducing a new dimension to data work: Natural Language to SQL. 

We all know the incredible power of 3rd Generation Chatbots that leverage large language models (LLMs) such as GPT-4. These advanced bots can have natural and engaging conversations, continue threads, generate content, and adapt to user’s behaviors. Organizations actively invest in this type of solutions that will work on their data and in the context of their business and environment. Basically, each of our clients has their goals of exploring and building chatbots that will be tailored to their needs and will best address their needs. 

In the development of Natural Language to SQL solutions, our aim was precisely this—to create a new channel of communication between analysts and data, enabling them to swiftly extract ad hoc insights. With a focus on rapid SQL database data retrieval, trust-building, and domain-specific knowledge incorporation, our goal is to create an AI assistant capable of understanding the underlying data model, ensuring accuracy across diverse queries, and avoiding hallucination. 

As I have already mentioned, today we have a lot of LLM models available that we can use. However, we must be aware that when building solutions tailored to our needs, there are several other fundamental things without which our solution will be useless: 

  • Appropriate architecture 
  • Maintaining and developing the knowledge base and metadata 
  • Quality of data and data management 

RAG Architecture 

RAG architecture stands for Retrieval-Augmented Generation. It’s an architecture in natural language processing that combines two components: a retriever and a large language model (LLM). This pattern is used to develop a solution working on/with enterprise data without the need for costly fine-tuning of the model (LLM). The retriever searches for relevant information from a knowledge base (vectorized chunks of data) while the LLM uses this retrieved information to generate contextually relevant responses using the provided information. This approach helps LLMs overcome their limitations of being trained on static datasets and allows them to access and incorporate up-to-date information, leading to more accurate and informative outputs. 

Knowledge Base Management

Knowledge Base Management 

The knowledge base refers to a centralized repository of information (specific to the use case) utilized by LLM models to provide relevant responses. It serves as the backbone for the functioning of enterprise-specific chatbot systems, enabling them to interpret queries, generate appropriate responses, and continuously improve their performance. Challenges related to maintaining and developing the knowledge base include: 

  1. Data Security: Protecting personal and confidential data is crucial, especially when knowledge bases contain sensitive information. 
  • TIP: There are two aspects of data security. The first is to design the architecture of the solution in such a way that the organization’s data always remains within its internal network and under the organization’s control. The LLM model used to build the bot should come from the organization’s cloud or be a small open-source model hosted on your own infrastructure. The second aspect is implementing robust guardrails for user inquiries and LLM responses, as well as encryption protocols, access controls, and data anonymization techniques that can help safeguard personal and confidential data stored within knowledge bases. Additionally, conducting regular security audits, implementing multi-factor authentication, and providing comprehensive employee training on data security best practices can further enhance protection measures. 
  1. Training and AI Development: Chatbots learn from user interactions, requiring continuous supervision, feedback analysis, and knowledge base adjustments. 
  • TIP: Companies should establish robust processes for training and developing their chatbot AI. This includes regularly monitoring chatbot interactions, analyzing user feedback, and identifying areas for improvement. Continuous refinement of the chatbot’s knowledge base is essential to ensure that it remains accurate in its responses. Additionally, leveraging machine learning techniques such as reinforcement learning can enable chatbots to adapt and improve over time based on user interactions. Investing in skilled AI developers and data scientists to oversee the chatbot’s development and optimization is crucial for achieving long-term success. Using pre-trained models can also help you cut down on computational expenses and carbon emissions while also saving you the time and resources needed to train a model from scratch. 
  1. Contextual Understanding: Chatbots need to comprehend queries in various contexts and respond accordingly. 
  • TIP: A notable issue with large language models (LLMs) such as GPT is their tendency to respond to inquiries with a high degree of certainty even when the information given may be incorrect—a phenomenon commonly referred to as hallucinations. While these inaccuracies might be tolerable within certain areas, they can be problematic in others. Retraining a model to avoid such specific inaccuracies can present challenges. Conversely, by utilizing a structured knowledge base such as a graph database for the chatbot’s responses, we can precisely manage and ensure the accuracy of the information the chatbot delivers. 
  1. Integration with Other Systems: Chatbots often require access to data stored in other company systems and databases. Data integration can be complex and may pose challenges in ensuring information consistency. 
  • TIP: Implementing robust API (Application Programming Interface) solutions can streamline data integration processes and ensure seamless communication between chatbots and other systems. Additionally, utilizing middleware platforms specifically designed for data integration can help manage and synchronize data across various systems effectively. Regular monitoring and maintenance of integration pipelines are also essential to identify and address any inconsistencies promptly. 
  1. Personalization of Responses: Tailoring communication to individual user needs is challenging if the knowledge base is not adequately diversified and customized. 
  • TIP: Implementing conversation management techniques can help analyze dialogue with users, allowing chatbots to deliver personalized responses. Additionally, leveraging dynamic content generation capabilities within the chatbot system can enable real-time customization of responses based on user interactions and context. Regularly updating and expanding the knowledge base with diverse content relevant to different user segments can also enhance personalization efforts. 
  1. Handling Complex Queries: Chatbots relying on simpler knowledge base models may struggle to process complex or ambiguous queries. 
  • TIP: To overcome this challenge, advanced techniques of using LLM models for generating SQL queries should be used. These should include approaches like chain-of-thoughts, tree-of-thoughts, multi-step reasoning, etc. Fine-tuning a small model for a custom solution should also be taken into account. Regularly monitoring chatbot performance and gathering user feedback can also inform ongoing refinement efforts and ensure that the system remains adept at handling diverse and nuanced interactions. Complex queries might require multiple SQL statements. The chatbot could benefit from explaining its reasoning and the generated SQL queries to the user. 
  1. Error Handling: Complex queries are prone to errors. 
  • TIP: The chatbot should be able to identify potential issues in the user’s request and offer suggestions for clarification or alternative approaches. 
  1. Understanding Mixed Intentions: Users may pose queries containing multiple intentions simultaneously, challenging the chatbot in accurate understanding and response. 
  • TIP: To address this challenge, chatbot architecture should contain a specialized dialogue management component that will deal with intent and entity extractions, collect additional information through a series of additional questions, analyze sentiment, and define fallbacks for situations when something goes off the rails. Additionally, continuously refining the chatbot based on user feedback can help improve its performance in handling such interactions. Providing users with clear prompts or options to clarify their intentions can also aid in disambiguating complex queries and ensuring accurate responses. 
  1. Difficulty in Evaluating Effectiveness: Companies must effectively measure the chatbot performance and quality to gauge the chatbot’s effectiveness in addressing user queries and providing accurate information. 
  • TIP: Companies should establish clear metrics and key performance indicators (KPIs) to assess the accuracy of chatbot responses and the overall performance of the knowledge base. These metrics may include accuracy rates, response time, user satisfaction scores, and task completion rates. Companies should also leverage user feedback and conduct regular usability testing to gather insights into how well the chatbot is meeting user needs and expectations. Additionally, implementing analytics tools and sentiment analysis techniques can provide valuable data on chatbot performance and user sentiment. By continuously monitoring and analyzing these metrics, companies can identify areas for improvement and make data-driven decisions to optimize the effectiveness of their chatbot and knowledge base. 

Conclusion 

While generative AI holds immense promise for revolutionizing data analysis, it’s essential for businesses to approach its adoption with a balanced perspective. The technology’s potential to enhance analytics experience and productivity is significant; however, the challenges and risks associated with poor data quality, high costs, and the complexity of large-scale AI projects cannot be overlooked. 

As we stand at this tipping point, it is crucial for enterprises to invest in building robust foundations, maintain realistic expectations, and continuously evaluate the effectiveness of their AI initiatives. By doing so, they can not only leverage the transformative power of generative AI but also navigate its challenges to achieve sustainable long-term success in data analysis and beyond. 

For more insights on leveraging generative AI in your business, contact our experts at C&F or explore our comprehensive solutions tailored to your needs.